Most chronic absence plans we see never mention the bus. They cover outreach, incentives, family engagement, and data dashboards, all worth doing. But if a student can’t physically get to school, none of it reaches them.
Student transportation gets budgeted as overhead. It should be budgeted as an attendance investment.
What the bus actually costs
The most widely cited national figure is from the 2015 to 2016 school year, when U.S. schools spent over $24 billion getting students to school. That worked out to roughly $1,000 per student transported, about 8% of average per pupil spending. The number has only grown since. By 2018 to 2019, the most recent federal count, it was nearly $28 billion. Nobody thinks it went down.
Two budgets that never meet
Here is the part that should bother all of us. That 8% is treated as the cost of running the building, while the attendance line item sits somewhere else entirely, funded as a program.
So when budget pressure arrives, and it always does, the route gets cut. In 2025, 73% of administrators said budget issues were affecting their transportation operations.
Then the chronic absence number moves the wrong direction, and the district goes looking for an engagement platform to fix it.
“Given the high costs of school transportation, targeting additional transportation services to chronically absent students as an attendance intervention may be more efficient than increasing bus services for all students.”
Danielle Sanderson Edwards, Assistant Professor of Education Policy, Old Dominion University
We cut the thing that worked and bought something to replace it.
A line to lead with
Roughly half of all U.S. public school students, more than 25 million children, get to school on a bus. Transportation is not attached to instruction. It is the delivery mechanism for instruction. Every dollar in it is a dollar buying attendance, and attendance is the precondition for everything else your district is trying to do.
If you are building next year’s budget right now, that is not a line to defend. It is a line to lead with.
See how Go Together helps districts build a multimodal SchoolPool program, explore solutions for school districts, or request a demo.
Sources:
- Edwards, D. S. (2024). Another One Rides the Bus: The Impact of School Transportation on Student Outcomes in Michigan. Education Finance and Policy, 19(1).
- National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics, Table 236.90: Students transported at public expense and current expenditures for transportation
- K-12 Dive: School transportation challenges impacting academics, attendance (Sept. 4, 2025), reporting on the 2025 State of School Transportation report by HopSkipDrive and AP-NORC
#ChronicAbsenteeism #StudentTransportation #SchoolFinance #AttendanceAwarenessMonth #YourPresenceMatters #K12
